Shop Indie Bookstores

Sebastian Junger’s War will be for the Afghanistan war what Michael Herr’s Dispatches was for the Vietnam War.  By capturing the unabashed experience of a platoon of soldiers in Afghanistan’s Korengal Valley, Junger has captured the essence of this war for this generation.  He doesn’t debate politics, because the politics of it all mean very little to the men fighting.  What matters is their collective survival and doing their job.   Junger uses biology, psychology, and military history to put what these men are going through mentally and physically into context.

Junger made five trips into the Korengal Valley over the course of a year.  He writes this about the valley:

The Korengal Valley is sort of the Afghanistan of Afghanistan: too remote to conquer, too poor to intimidate, too autonomous to buy off.  The Soviets never made it past the mouth of the valley and the Taliban didn’t dare go in there at all.

It is a sparsely populated slit of steep mountainsides and draws near Pakistan, and it was the most dangerous posting in Afghanistan.  It is nicknamed the Valley of Death.  The U.S. withdrew all troops from the valley a month before Junger’s book was published, stating a shift in strategy in the larger war effort.

Junger follows several men more than others, but he never delves into one soldier’s character completely.  They are a collective, and they operate as a whole.  He finds that the best fighting men are the worst garrison soldiers.  They’re troublemakers.  In fact the platoon has a tradition of beating all new members, including officers.  They beat guys when they go to and come back from R&R.  The only way you can leave without getting beaten is to be wounded or dead. Speaking of being poor garrison soldiers, one soldier states, “Okay, I got to shine my fucking boots.  Why do I care about shining my goddamn boots?”  But these are the men you want with you in a firefight.

The sheer physical toil of the war is almost unbelievable.  The men tote 80 to 100 pound packs up and down steep slopes.  The rocks shred their clothes. They carve an outpost out of mountainside in the middle of the night.  The outposts are infested with fleas and tarantulas.  And not least of all, they receive enemy fire on almost a daily basis. Junger states that the men reek of ammonia because they have burned all the fat from their bodies and are now burning muscle.

The only thing worse than the physicality of the war is the psychological strain.  One soldier compares the rush of adrenaline from a firefight to crack, and many of the mean don’t know how they will handle returning to the States.  Junger writes:

The attention to detail at a base like Restrepo forced a kind of clarity on absolutely everything a soldier did until I came to think of it as a kind of Zen practice: the Zen of not fucking up.  It required a high mindfulness because potentially everything had consequences.

Of course the war in Afghanistan has its own peculiarities, but it is still war.  It shares what all wars have in common. When one of the men discusses signing back up after his tour despite all of the terror and violence he has experienced, Junger writes:

War is a big and sprawling word that brings a lot of human suffering into the conversation, but combat is a different matter.  Combat is the smaller game that young men fall in love with, and any solution to the human problem of war will have to take into account the psyches of these young men.  For some reason there is a profound and mysterious gratification to the reciprocal agreement to protect another person with your life, and combat is virtually the only situation in which that happens regularly.  These hillsides of loose shale and holly trees are where the men feel not most alive- that you can get skydiving- but the most utilized.  The most necessary.  The most clear and certain and purposeful.  If young men could get that feeling at home, no one would ever want to go to war again, but they can’t.

Sebastian Junger and photographer Tim Hetherington filmed a Sundance award-winning documentary about their experiences with Battle Company in the Korengal Valley.  The film is name Restrepo, after the base carved in the mountainside.  The base was named after a medic who was killed.

Shop Indie Bookstores

 

After several years, I re-subscribed to Tin House.  I thought it would inspire me to be more diligent in my reading, but I’m afraid it may make me fall farther behind, which is why I unsubscribed the first time.  It just makes me feel better about myself to subscribe to a great literary magazine.  Sometimes you just need those false and worldly self-esteem boosters.  Anyway, here we go. The Winter issue is subtitled “Strong Coffee and a Good Read.” Most issues have a theme, but I think I am correct in saying this issue is theme-less. If I have missed it, please let me know.

The issue kicks off with “iff,” a short story by Antonya Nelson.  She is considered a “master” of the form, but I’m not seeing it in this example.  I found the narrator extremely annoying, and by the end of the story I thought, “No wonder your husband left you, your kid’s whipped by his girlfriend, and your mother-in-law is suicidal.” Moving on.

Michael Dickman’s poem “False Start” is one of my favorite pieces in this issue.  Each of the five segments begin with the line, “At the end of one of the billion light years of loneliness…” With an opening line like that, the poem has to be great.  The speaker addresses his mother, father, and brother.  It begins with his mother in the kitchen feeding flies from her fingertips, but the imagery shifts to the ocean and restoration.  I’m not sure what it all means, but I like it.

Karen Shepard’s “There Be Monsters” is a subtle dismantling of an wife and mother.  She begins by telling us that when Natalie and her husband were dating, they joked about “deal breakers” in a marriage.

Now Natalie thinks of the things that deserved to be deal breakers but that you let slip while you waited for further evidence, extenuating circumstances, explanations worthy of forgiveness. Things that now, twenty years down the road, are off-limits, unfair game. You took them off the table yourself. They sequestered themselves in their own little room, emerging for purposes of mockery and torment.

Natalie wishes her husband would do something unforgivable, something to let her out of her marriage.  I felt for her at first, but as the story progresses, Shepard reveals that Natalie is not as together as she imagines.  Towards the end, I didn’t like Natalie very much, but I got the feeling Natalie didn’t like Natalie very much.  There is a moment of light at the end, but it’s hard to say if it is enough for the family.

Ben Marcus’ “The Moors” is the centerpiece of this issue.  Editor Rob Spillman describes it this way”

Ben Marcus, who, in true literary-convention-spanking style presents us with “The Moors,” in which he blatantly ignores Fiction Rule Number 12: It is impossible to write a thirty-seven page story about a hapless man tied in knots over what to say to a colleague as they arrive at the coffee station at the same time.

That doesn’t quite do this story justice.  It will make you laugh.  It will make you want to beat the ever-living snot out of the narrator.  It will make you question your own sanity by the time you finish it.  The Moors is the break room in the labs where the narrator, Thomas, works.  He describes it this way:

The Moors may just as well have had a genital-removal station you visited on your way out, water-fountain height, retractable into the wall.  Tilt in your hips and come back clean.  And the egghead architects laughing and pointing, maybe even rubbing themselves into states of ecstasy… It was a pornographic pleasure, no doubt, to watch people killed in buildings, killed slowly, brought just near death and held in suspension simply by precalculated dimensions, by room design.

You see, in real time the events of the story would probably take five minutes at the most, but Thomas goes on for thirty-seven pages thinking of these things in his head, while the attractive co-worker in front of him pours her coffee.  To give you a clue as to Thomas’ mental state, he describes his co-worker breathing  as “A soft wall swollen with something almost unbearably luscious underneath. Was that an okay thought to have? Hello soft wall, he wanted to say. I love you.”

There is much more sweet goodness in this issue, but I feel I have already overstayed my welcome.  I will leave you with Ana Menendez’s excellent essay about traveling through Afghanistan in the late 1990s- “From Kandahar to Herat.” Menendez witnesses boy soldiers patrolling the streets with whips and a Friday execution.  Her epiphany comes when she is traveling through Dasht- e- Margow, “The Desert of Death.” They are caught on the road after dark because of car trouble.  Bandits are a serious fear.  She writes, “As the sun began to set and the desert went on and on, panic started to set in.  What if the drivers were in league with the bandits? How would we respond to a roadblock? To a rape?”

And then, of course, they encounter a roadblock.  As they approach, their fear turns to joy. “The translator cheered: ‘It’s Taliban!’”  They CHEERED because it was Taliban.  They were safe.  Menendex concludes,

…The image lingers more than a decade later. “Taliban!” With what joy we said it.  And with that flood of relief, I remember, also came a terrible wisdom.  In the years since, I’ve learned not to rush to understanding. That life’s brutality can be unfathomable.  And that freedom is a pleasing abstraction until some horror finds you vulnerable and alone.  Then, you gladly trade your visions of hell for a truck full of boy soldiers who once filled you only with a pure and uncomplicated fear.

Yep.  I’m glad I re-subscribed.

© 2011 Wilson Knut's Witticisms Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha