Nancy Pearcey begins her book Saving Leonardo: A Call To Resist the Secular Assault on Mind, Morals, & Meaning with an introduction discussing why Americans are disillusioned with politics.  I almost abandoned the book.  I’m glad I didn’t.  Pearcey examines competing secular worldviews throughout history looking at science, philosophy, and the humanities.  She explains how these secular worldviews ultimately commit logical suicide and how “the only hope lies in a worldview that is rationally defensible, life-affirming, and rooted in creation itself.”

Pearcey states that some Christians ask, “Isn’t it better to just preach the simple gospel?” She responds that to people lost in the maze of global secular worldviews supported by every aspect of culture the gospel is not simple.  She writes:

Christians are called to tear down mental fortresses [the Apostle Paul’s metaphor in 2 Corinthians] and liberate people from the power of false ideas… Once the walls are torn down, then the message of salvation is the same for everyone—scientist or artist, educated or uneducated, city or rural.
Traditionally, churches have responded to fortresses not by demolishing them but by building counter-fortresses—with thick, high walls to shut out the world.  They adopted an isolationist strategy to shield people from false ideas.

Pearcey explains that the isolationist strategy ultimately backfires, and young Christians do not have the ability to answer deep personal questions or wrestle with doubt before being confronted with conflicting secular worldviews.  She quotes a study that found young Christians grew more confident in their faith when adults served as guides in exploring difficult questions and challenges in life and secular worldviews.   Pearcey suggests Christians must learn how to practice what Apostle Paul taught: “Test everything; hold fast to what is good” (1 Thess. 5:21).  To do that, Christians must understand and decode worldviews in order to “demonstrate love for others… and find ways to connect God’s truth with their innermost concerns and questions.”

After laying the groundwork for why Christians need to examine worldviews, Pearcey begins discussing how the concept of truth about the world has been changed throughout history.  The concept of truth has been split into two essential elements by secular worldviews: facts (public, objective, universal) and values (private, subjective, relative).  Pearcey examines how the fact /value split plays out in empiricism, rationalism, romanticism, realism, naturalism, modernism, postmodernism, and just about every –ism you can name.  She uses art, philosophy, science, music, literature, and film from the various time periods and movements as examples.   It really is a crash course in science and the humanities.

Ultimately, the fact/value dualism split in all its incarnations fails.

The consequence of those secular views is inevitably dehumanizing.   The reason is that secularism in all its forms is reductionist.  A worldview that does not start with God must start with something less than God—something within creation—which then becomes the category to explain all of reality.  Think back to Walker Percy’s metaphor of a box.  Empiricism puts everything in the box of the senses.  Rationalism puts everything into the box of human reason.  Anything that does not fit into the box is denied, denigrated, or declared to be unreal.  The diverse and multi-faceted world God created is reduced to a single category.
Humans, too, are stuffed into the box.  Thus every idol is ultimately dehumanizing, leaving a wreckage of pain and alienation in its wake… A biblically based worldview is capable of affirming the best insights of secular philosophies without ever falling into reductionism.  That’s because it does not start with anything in creation but with the transcendent Creator.  It does not deify any part of creation—and therefore it is not compelled to deny the other parts of creation.  It recognizes and rejoices in the vast diversity and complexity of created reality.

I particularly found the discussions of art and music interesting.  Western culture loves science, which falls on the “fact” side of the dualism split.  Since art and religion fall on the “value” side of dualism, Western culture has marginalized them.  It would make sense that Christians would embrace the arts, but the reality is they do the exact opposite.  Pearcey states that most Christians build their counter-fortresses, condemn immoral content in the arts, and isolate themselves from it.  Or they try to be liberal Christians and find something redemptive in everything, without any rationale or scriptural basis.

Pearcey writes, “Biblical truth is so rich and multi-dimensional that it can affirm what is true in every worldview, while at the same time critiquing its errors and transcending it limitations. In this way, Christianity makes possible the greatest intellectual and artistic freedom.” Christians should evaluate everything against the truth of a biblical worldview. The problem is Christians have to have the tools for critical analysis and come out of their isolation to engage in the conversation.  Too often Christians accept their own version of the dualism split and settle for the equivalent of “spiritual junk food.”  Pearcey uses the “Jesus-is-my-girlfriend” genre of praise music that is now popular as an example.  Worship is moved to the “value” side of the split and becomes nothing more than an egocentric emotional buzz separate from the reality of life. She writes:

A full-orbed work of Christian art should include all three elements of the biblical worldview: Creation, Fall, Redemption.  It should allude to the beauty and dignity of the original creation. But it should also be transparently honest about the reality of sin and suffering.  Finally, it should always give hints of redemption… Some ray of hope should penetrate the darkness.

C.S. Lewis stated that Christians should be the most creative and deepest thinkers in all subject areas, until people wonder why the best art, books, music, and movies are by Christians.  Christians have to recognize their own version of dualism and adapt a truly biblical worldview that embraces the beauty and aesthetics of art in order to do that. The last two chapters focus on practical application.

Saving Leonardo covers a tremendous amount of information and territory in roughly 320 pages.  It is not the easiest read, but it is worth it.  Any time a book goes from children’s cartoons to quantum physics to abstract expressionism, the reader has to put in some work.  Pearcey’s tremendous intelligence and insight makes this book an education in itself.

 

 


Shop Indie Bookstores

I was sixty pages into this book when I realized it had already earned a spot  in my top-ten favorite nonfiction books.  Don’t ask me what the other nine are because I had never thought about my top-ten favorite nonfiction books until that moment.  I just know that Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art is one of them.  This is a graphic novel about the theory, history, and art of comic books.  What hooked me though was McCloud’s presentation of how the human mind handles images and language, and he does it within the comic format.  It is nothing short of genius.

McCloud begins the book trying to answer the question “what is comics?”  The definition he comes up with is “juxtaposed pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence, intended to convey information and/or produce an aesthetic response in the viewer.” He goes on to examine that definition by looking at how comics have evolved through human history, from the Aztecs to the 1400s to modern day.  What we often consider to be a childish form of entertainment today is a form of communication that seems to have been natural to humans since our beginning. And McCloud argues that comics are a legitimate art form that has largely gone unstudied.

It is chapter two that begins to look deeper into how images affect us.  I found it fascinating, and like I said, by chapter three I was hooked.  McCloud’s theories are not really new.  Marshall McLuhan, Will Eisner, Neil Postman, and others have written about how media affects us, but McCloud’s presentation makes all the difference for me.  What’s Marshall McLuhan’s famous saying?  The medium is the message?

McCloud goes into the theory, the nuts and bolts if you will, of comics making- panel arrangement, the different types of transitions, the style of art, time, line, and color.   What keeps all of this accessible to those of us who aren’t artists is the fact that McCloud always brings it back to how the reader is a participant in all of this.  A discussion on how time is handled in comics didn’t mean much to me until I saw how I create the time and motion from the ink on the paper.

Another recurring theme is how all of this is a relatively new art form in terms of being examined and pushed to its limits.  Novels, poetry, music, art- virtually everything that could be done has been done.  McCloud argues that comics still have a lot of unexplored territory.  He touches on how some artists and writers have experimented with the aforementioned aspects of comics, like time and color. He encourages new writers and artists to do more.

I would have loved to have used this book when I taught High School English.  I’m sure it would have saved the lives of some of the gang members I taught.  As an English major, I feel slightly cheated that this wasn’t in the curriculum.  It should be required reading in College English classes, but as McCloud states, new art forms are judged by their predecessors.  Any study of language, art, and what it means to humans would greatly benefit from Understanding Comics.  Am I laying it on too thick?  I can’t say enough good things about his book.  Art Spiegelman, author of Maus,  writes this:

Cleverly disguised as an easy-to-read comic book, Scott McCloud’s simple-looking tome deconstructs the secret language of comix while casually revealing secrets of Time, Space, Art, and the Cosmos! The most intelligent comix I’ve seen in a long time.

The Cosmos, people.  It doesn’t get any better than that.

Shop Indie Bookstores

© 2011 Wilson Knut's Witticisms Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha